Life 3 sources 2 updates
Read
Court of Cassation: calling spouse a "donkey, animal" constitutes an attack on personal rights
Published Updated
The Court of Cassation's 2nd Civil Chamber ruled that a husband who called his wife "eşeksin, hayvansın" ("you're a donkey, you're an animal") was at fault, finding the words constituted an attack on personal rights and that the wife must be paid material and moral compensation.
Mentioned in this story
Sources
Source spectrum State State Pro-government Pro-gov Independent Indep. Opposition Opp. Foreign Foreign 
Hürriyet2nd to publish the story17 Sept, 09:42 Yargıtay'dan emsal karar: Eşe 'eşek' demek hem boşanma hem tazminat sebebi 
DünyaFirst to publish the story17 Sept, 09:29 Eşe 'Eşek' demek hem boşanma hem tazminat sebebi 
Diyarbakır Söz3rd to publish the story17 Sept, 11:41 O söz, hem boşanma hem tazminat sebebi
Hürriyet2nd to publish the story17 Sept, 09:42 Yargıtay'dan emsal karar: Eşe 'eşek' demek hem boşanma hem tazminat sebebi DünyaFirst to publish the story17 Sept, 09:29 Eşe 'Eşek' demek hem boşanma hem tazminat sebebi Diyarbakır Söz3rd to publish the story17 Sept, 11:41 O söz, hem boşanma hem tazminat sebebi Story thread
- Court of Cassation overturns poverty alimony ruling for spouse with comparable income The Court of Cassation's 2nd Civil Chamber found unlawful the ruling by the Bakırköy 13th Family Court that awarded poverty alimony to a retired woman with a regular income whose income level was close to her spouse's; the divorce ruling itself was upheld.
- Court of Cassation: calling spouse a "donkey, animal" constitutes an attack on personal rights The Court of Cassation's 2nd Civil Chamber ruled that a husband who called his wife "eşeksin, hayvansın" ("you're a donkey, you're an animal") was at fault, finding the words constituted an attack on personal rights and that the wife must be paid material and moral compensation.